Real Div Ltd

To request notice, of when book is available, how, price etc.
OR Tel:
Before planning the battles of the Sino-Korean Pocket [SKP] (Planned for in the area defined by the Yalu River estended 10 to 20 miles south of its tip, and a line 10 to 20 miles west, This 1,200-square-mile area would be bordered by dirty atomic mines: Which, if exploded, would make the enclosed area unsurvivable for humans and most animals, for more than 20 ninutes for the next ~100 years.) 

I organized both strategy and tactics: (One of my degrees was in Naval Science and Tactics.The Science I studied, has little to do with the strategy I planned: But the Tactics is similar, in many ways, with the tactics I planned, (originally based on what I learned as an Infantry Corporal, Captain's Messenger and bearer of Platoon Guidon, of the Missouri State Guard, age14-16, and later in university NROTC cadet and then as a Naval Commanding Officer and Intelligence Officer). 

The technique I used was to review what I had learned about war leaders:

1. policies (and specific strategies employed in support of those policies), of famous (and infamous) leaders,
   
2. successes
   
3. mistakes (causing failures), and their
   
4. failures (themselves).

For example, Adolph Hitler's life history was the easiest, most available (except the minor bits Russia could glean from his body and, presumably, his brain) and understandable, especially about policies: And, also, strategies and, also, mistakes and, also. failures. This entire panoply, related to infamous Hitler, was widely available: But. not so much, for more famous leaders, because they didn't have any, or they were able to conceal whatever they wanted to. (For example: Success(es) can be used to conceal mistakes and failures: But, seldom, can failure be used to conceal mistakes.)

Again, for example: The most important policies of  Hitler was to pick:

• which wars to fight
  
• which allies to ally with 
  
• which leaders to lead (under him) and
  

that picking the worst policies almost guarantees the worst mistakes.

His worst policy (worst mistake) was to attack Russia, instead of retaining Russia as an ally. An arrangement which Hitler and Stalin were, almost certainly, able to agree to, was to protect each other's backs: From, every (most likely) democracy who would actually attack (or oppose) either one. Of course, the possibility of back stabbing by one or the other would be a risk: To one or the other, or both. (I had expected that, more from Stalin, to assassinate Hitler (vis-a-vis) Leon Trotsky, or Stalin's assassination, rather than Hitler's attacking Russia en-masse. (My plan to rework my Savage rifle, to rent out, or to help me use it myself, or hiring someone to do it, either with, or without, pay changing hands, was well under way (in the early 40s: But, was overtaken by Count Claus von Stauffenberg's plans, with respect to using my rifle, at least.)

Hitler's second worst policy (second worst mistake) was to choose Mussolini as an ally. Mussolini stabbing him in the back was unlikely in any case, as an allie, or not. If not an Allie, attacking Germany (over the mountains), with or without help from another Allie was very, very difficult. So, forget about him, he could not help or hinder, to any significant extent..

His third worst policy (third worst mistake) was to choose (any of) thr leaders he led to help him destroy Jews and Jewish society  (It was stupid, unnecessary, unimportant and irrelevant to maintaining his power base: But, he was right, and fortunate, about:

• There was no country with enough Jewish influence to punish him for whatever he did to the German Jews
• There were few German (or neighboring) Jews who were both intelligent enough and influential enough to seriously oppose (or kill him: But, I would have, and could have): But
  
• Unfortunately, for the Jews, I was under 18, not Jewish: But,
  
• Fortunately for them, not baby-age-indoctrinated against any race or religion, or atheists, as opposed to Pope Innocent III, or to lesser extent Pope Innocent II. 

 I conducted lightning paced studies to learn about  and  pick the most famous leaders, over the last thousand years (and some infamous ones):

• Which I could use to plan the battles
• pick examples of leaders to model on
  
• pick new leaders and
  
• teach them how to behave (like the former, successful, leaders).
  

I learned and came up with:

• The Duke of Wellington, and Napoleon
• With respect to the Battle of Waterloo,
  
• Relevant to the battles of SKP, and
  
• William the Bastard and King Harold
  
• With respect to the Bastards invasion of England in 1066
  
• Relevant to the battles of Chiang  Kai-Shek's reinvasion of China, which I intended to encourage..

Revalent to SKP, I picked de Gaulle,  and modeled him (and would try to teach him) to behave like The Duke of Wellington, and pick, by himself, who the Chinese (and Russians) would model their leader on (and. obviously, their policies, strategies and tactics). (Probably, if Russians "counter attacked", which they always preferred, they would pick The Duke, who made the fewest mistakes, not like Napoleon. The Chinese would view both sides of all the battles as attacking and pick Napoleon (based on his size?, or his aggresion) and working with a unified organization; at least (unlikely to make mistakes in foreign languages: Which, could be their mistake).

So far this is the outline of the planning, and, to some extent why. If possible, I will expand to explain more about why, and how.

Later, if and when there is an "after the battles", I will prepare II, the outline of the history (especlally the results) of the battles and why.