|
Amalric IIIMedium Trimaran The Name of the Medium Trimaran
Gavin Embry [GE], of RDL, has designed several versions of trimarans. The medium sized version is the basis of the Amalric III, described below: named after a (possible) descendant of King Amalric II (or King Amalric I ) of Jerusalem (also Amaury or Aimery) (1136 – July 11, 1174) was King of Jerusalem 1162–1174, (Please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalric_I_of_Jerusalem) Originally, the French versions of his name were "Amaury" or "Aimery", probably gradually evolved into Amory, Emory, Emery, and finally, to Henrie or Henry Embrie, the name of Gavin Embry's [GE] 10th paternal grandfather, who sailed from Gravesend, Kent on the America, immigrating to Virginia, in 1635ad, with his prospective wife, Joan Joab, whom he meet on board.
Trimaran Background (extracted from Trimaran):
" Construction
Trimarans have a number of
advantages over comparable monohulls (conventional, single-hulled sailboats).
Given two boats of the same length, the trimaran has a shallower draft, a wider
beam, less hull area, and is able to fly more sail area. In addition, because
of the wide beam, trimarans do not need the weighted keel monohull, is able to sail in shallower water, and maintains
its stability in stronger winds. However, its wider beam makes it a little more
cumbersome to maneuver, so tacking and jibing can be trickier, and the narrower
hulls provide less living space than an equivalently-sized monohull, required in
monohulls. As a result, the trimaran offers much better straight-line
performance than a monohull.
As the righting moment (the force that resists the opposite torque
of the wind on the sails) is produced by a float on either side called an ama
and not a heavy protruding keel, trimarans are lighter and faster than a monohull of
equivalent length. A lightweight retractable keel, referred to as a centerboard
is often employed to resist lateral movement, making many models easily beachable. Most
trimarans are nearly impossible to flip sideways given a reasonable degree of
caution, however, trimarans can reach speeds so great in a storm that they can
plow into a wave and flip end-over-end. This hazard is especially dangerous for
a multihull
because of their wide beam. The front of the boat, often covered by trampoline, acts as a giant paddle rather
than a narrow monohull would. To avoid this unfortunate scenario trimaran
sailors are advised to use trampolines with a large weave and employ parachute drogues and sea anchors
whenever appropriate.
The father of the modern sailing
trimaran is Victor Tchetchet, a Russian émigré and a strong proponent of
multihull sailing. Mr. Tchetchet, who was a fighter pilot during the First
World War in the Czar’s Air Force, lived in Great Neck, New York from the
1940’s until his death. He built two trimarans while living in the US, Eggnog 1
and 2. Both boats were made of marine
plywood and were about 24 feet long. Mr. Tchetchet is credited with coining
the name trimaran. Aside from boat design Mr. Tchetchet earned his living as a
landscape and portrait painter.
Advantages
Although it is possible for a
trimaran to capsize, this is less frequent than with monohull boats because of
the greater resistance to rolling that the amas
offer. Most trimaran designs are considered nearly unsinkable because even when
filled with water, the flotation of one ama is enough to keep the entire vessel
afloat. Because of their stability and safety, trimarans such as the Challenger
class have become popular with sailors who have restricted mobility.
Disadvantages
Trimarans capsizes are more likely
to be of the pitch-pole type than a roll to one side due to their higher
sideways stability and speeds. Capsized trimarans are harder to turn upright
than monohull boats. However, many monohull boats sink when capsized. A
capsized trimaran should not be righted by sideways rotation as this usually
causes heavy damage of the mast and rigging. Harnesses pulling on the stern
toward the bow, or from the bow toward the stern of capsized trimarans have
been shown to be able to successfully turn them end-over-end. Several design
features reduce the chance of pitch-pole capsize. These include having wing
nets with an open weave designed to reduce windage and decks and nets that shed
water easily. The best way to avoid capsize is to reduce the efficiency of the
sails in heavy weather conditions.
Trimarans at anchor or mooring may
follow the wind due to their light weight and shallow draft while monohulls
usually follow the tides. This can cause collisions if the trimaran is close to
another vessel and the swing circles overlap. A bridle to the anchor line may
assist in reducing this swing.
Potential buyers of trimarans should look for one that is designed with amas with multiple sealed partitions, controls that all run to the cockpit. a collision bulkhead, partial or full cockpit coverings or windshields, and drain holes in the cockpit that can adaquately drain the cockpit quickly, among other things."
General Description of the Amalric III
The Amalric III [AIII] trimaran's main hull was originally called a vaka. The current, medium-sized trimaram's main hull [AIIIm], is twice as long as the Inspiration, just above: 60 feet ['] long and 8' wide, for flotation and voyages on rivers, lakes, seas and oceans. It carries sponsons (akas) on both starboard [AS] and port [AP] sides, to stabilize and and make possible a shallow draft of 6', or less, even when normally loaded. The after end (20'x8') of the AIIIm is reserved for a platform for takeoff and landing of Gavin Hawks, but can also carry:
- Any combination of up-to-four-20'-long shipping containers, or DSs, in up-to-two rows of up-to-two layers (a possible total of four) on the after deck.
The remaining 40'x8', AIIIm, deck space accomodates:
- any combination of up-to-eight 20' long shipping containers or DSs, in up-to-two two/line-long of up-to-two layers, or consisting of
- any combination of up-to-four 40' long containers or DHs, in up-to-two lines of up-to-two layers or
- any combination of 20' and 40' long containers, DS' and/or DHs up to 40' long, in up-to-two lines and up-to-two layers
- alternatively, zero-to-eight DaviHas, ([DS] and [DH]) of appropriate 20' and 40' lengths, can replace zero-to-eight of corresponding lengths of shipping containers. If properly equipped docking facilities are provided, DaviHas can use drive-on-drive-off sponsons and AIIIm.
The platforms are elevated to 11' above the main deck level to clear the rotors of Gavin Hawks above the roof of any adjacent container or DaviHas. On the AIIIm, this can be raised another 11' to clear another container or DaviHas carried at the second level. Underneath the platform, the area can carry up-to-four-additional-20'-long containers, or DS. While underway, the AIII must carry at least one "Command" DaviHas [CDS or CDH], which is equipped to supply electric power and navigate it [DSn or DHn]. The Command DaviHas must be:
- just below the landing platform
- on top of any other container, or DaviHas not under a platform or
- uncovered, on the open deck.
The sponsons are either AS (30'x3') or AH (50'x6'). Both types have sufficient bouyancy to prevent the AIII from capsizing and to avoid the necessity of a keel, so that its draft can be 6' or less. The 50' long version can carry one 40' long container or DH, or two 20' long containers or DSs. They both also carry electrically powered screws, which can be powered and controlled by the DS or DH carried by the AIIIm. If no containers or platforms are carried, the alas (which we call) sponsons can be raised to pass through locks or canals, 18' wide, or more. The larger, 50'x6' version can each carry two platforms, or a shipping container, with two platforms on its roof. Carrying a container or not, both sponsons can allow the takeoff, landing and storage of up-to-two Gavin Hawks, each, four in total, including refuelling and servicing each one within one-half-hour. Each AIII can be used as Stationary Micro-Airport [SMA] or Mobile Micro-Airport [MMA]. Each one handles up to 10 Gavin Hawks, four on their two sponsons and six on the AIIIm. And, on board the AIIIm, two-at-a-time taking off or landing and zero-to-six more stored on the roofs of
- shipping containers
- DaviHas, or
- the open deck, for a maximum of 10.
An equal number of Gavin "SuperSea" Hawks [GSSH] can, land on, be refueled and takeoff from the surrrounding area of water. This can be,
- while docked
- at anchor, or
- while under way, afloat or at sea.
If all the GH and GSSH carry the maximum of 10 passengers each, the air passengers on board would be 100, either landing, taking off or resting on board. If DaviHas are carried (instead of shipping containers) the comfortable capacity is 100 including guests, 80 people including overnight guests or 40 for permanent occupancy. Adding the 100 transient air passengers, brings the maximum number of passengers on board to 200.
Amalric III in Convoys
Properly equipped, CDSs or CDHs can be tenders for
several AIII, serving as Stationary-Micro-Airports [SMA], or herding
several others sailing in convoys at sea: one or more of
the AIII, also serving as Mobile-Micro-Airports [MMA]. CDSs and CDHs can
drive-off and drive-on to another AIII chosen to be the "Flag" AIII [FAIII]
for the group. RDL is planning the same kind of flexibility for forming of convoys as SMA, MMA or for transport or passenger vessels, as is done for GHs. It is also possible that Mother Hawks and piloted or pilotless Master Chief Super Hawks [MCSH] can be used to control and protect convoys of AIII.
Up-to-100s
of AIIIs may be formed into conveys, to carry passengers and/or freight
sea transportation, or serve as oceanic or sea based
Mobile-Micro-Airports [MMA]. Each MMA can carry up-to-10 GHs, each of which may carry up-to-10 passengers, for a total of up-ro-100 air-born passengers/MMA. The combination of DHs' sea travelers and GHs'
air travelers can accomodate up-to-200 passengers or 188 passengers,
plus 12 crew in the Flag CDH [FCDH], or 194 passengers, plus six crew in the Flag CDS [FCDS].
Up-to-one of the 10 GHs handled by each AIII could be a Master Chief Super Hawk [MCSH] equipped to control and protect the
AIII or a convoy of up-to-100 AIIIs. A "super" convoy of up-to-100 AIIIs can
carry up-to-20,000 passengers and crew, and up to 100 MCSH with
zero-up-to-200 pilots, for control and protection.
(Another medium range RDL plan is to combine sail with motor power for AIII. As:
- sails require masts,
- masts must be retractable to pass under bridges and
- masts must be avoided by GHs' rotors, then:
- sailing AIII are all sea goers and are restricted to three GH landing and takeoff platforms and carrying up-to-four GHs on the AIIIm; but
- without the ability to raise the sponsons to pass through less than 60' wide canals.)
For planning purposes, RDL targets GH's initial range as ~4,500 miles, at 400mph. Fairly small convoys, up-to-about-20 AIIIs, can be stationed in mid-ocean to service passing flocks of GHs traveling between Continents, giving a combined maximum range of 9000 miles. Allowing one hour for de-flocking (15 min.), refueling (30 min.) and re-flocking (15 min), the 9,000 miles would take 23 hours allowing another 0.5 hours for initial flocking and final de-flocking. Airplane travel at 600mph takes 15 hours plus 4 hours for planeing and de-planeing, a total of 19 hours. For a more typical 5000 mile trip (eg London to San Francisco CA), it would take 12.33 hours compared to 14 hours for the GH flock, including the refueling stop. (A longer range at higher speeds could be realized by about 2014. If improved fuel efficiency and costs can also be achieved, it may be possible to reduce or eliminate the need for mid-oceanic refueling of GH flocks, therefore reassigning MMA to other duties.)
Each MMA is expected to land, refuel and takeoff ten GHs (and the same number of GSSHs, landing and taking off on water) every hour, five at a time. Fifty MMAs could service 6,000 GHs and GSSH,
carrying up to 120,000 passengers in 13 daylighted hours. Roughly mid-way
between the six Continents, this volume of traffic, in both directions, could be managed by
30, 20-AIII-strong-centers. Ie 600 AIIIs, handling traffic of 144,000 GHs
with 1.44 passengers/day-lighted-day. On a
13-hours/7-days/52-weeks/year schedule; the annual capacity is 525.6m
trans-oceanic-passengers/year. On a fairly reasonable price of
$200/passenger/trip, the revenue is $105.12b/year, or $175.2m/AIII/year.
For an AIII lifespan of five years, each AIII would earn $876m.
RDL targets the costs at:
- 2% of revenue, $10.512b for building and five years of maintenance of 600 AIIIs, ie $8.72m/AIII (50 AIIIs to anchor in the Thames Estaury would require £436m).
- 40% for the fuel produced to refuel GH and GSSH, ie total $210.24b, ie $350.4m/AIII.
this supports refueling Hawks 262.8m times, or $800/trip or
$80/passenger, if Hawks were loaded to capacity of 10 passengers on each
trip
- After the RDL planned after-profit at 20% of revenue of $4.1b/year, the remaining 38%, a total of $9b/year, would be left to
cover operations, including labor and overheads.
AIII could used with one or more of the following:
- along with independent plants near lakes, rivers (such as the Thames Estaury), lakes or sea shores with access to sunlight, wind, waves, tides and or subsurface heat (for energy) to make hydrogen to deliver in DaviHas to:
1. filling stations 2. homes (not in Utopia or Mini-Utopia-Villages), but for 3. cars 4. Gavin Hawks or 5. anybody, anywhere else, who needs hydrogen
- on the same location, stationed as Stationary Micro-Airports [SMA] to land, refuel, and take off Gavin Hawks, which are used also to
- deliver hydrogen in Gavin Hawks to remote, difficult to service by road or expensive to distribute by pipeline, say, in
1. mid-ocean 2. Alaska 3. Africa 4. Siberia. or 5. Tibet 6. etc.
The best choice seems to be a combination of cheap (or free, probably fresh) water, and sources of energy that could be used to generate electricity. If the price of electricity and water is low enough, then we can pay for distribution for much less than building pipelines and stop producing CO2 in many different ways. (GE once helped KE choose the best place for an aluminum plant (in Chalmette Louisiana) because we could import cheap bauxite from Jamaica and get cheap natural gas in - Louisiana.) Same idea, but let's not use gas this time, neither natural (to make electricity) nor liquid (to run cars or airplanes).
Another application would be using the AIII, with its amas (sponsons) filled with hydrogen and carrying on board up-to-12 DaviHas, choosing the ones already designed to deliver hydrogen. The towns and cities around the lakes, rivers or seasides could be supplied from the amas and the filling stations and other customers. The surrounding areas still accessible by road could be supplied from the DaviHas. Up-to-10 Gavin Hawks, also carried by, AIII could supply areas otherwise completely inaccessible.
(No $20 trillion pipelines and no CO2! emissions!!).
Special versions of Gavin Hawks have their hulls shaped to takeoff and land on water.
Amalric III [AIII] as Aircraft Carriers.
- service flocks of 6,000 Gavin Super Hawks
[GSHs]
(within a day). This would handle 60k passengers/day, up-to 2.9m passengers/year. Doubling this facility by using an equal number of Gavin "SuperSea" Hawks, would double this capacity to 5.8m/year
- travel from up-to-4500 miles away,
- depart for round trips of destinations
- up-to-2,200 miles away
- remain overhead for an hour, or
land and take off, then
- return to the same, or another, convoy for refueling
- then return home or go to
- any other available refueling bases up to 4500 miles away, to refuel for another 4500-mile-trip etc, etc.
- Zero-to-all passengers can
be left upon the landing. This gives a combined maximum traveling trip range of indefinate
miles for 2,400 GSHs, carrying up to 24,000 troops
- One or more of such convoys could also serve as bases for a PATCOs for control and protection of local operations (flight, land, refuel and takeoff) and control of Mother Hawks and/or Master Chief Super Hawks [MCSHs] in charge of flocks of GSHs operating in combat operation areas
- Six-hundred AIII, ie 30, small-20-strong convoys could handle 144,000 GSHs and GSSHs (with 1.44m (armed) troops)/day. Assuming making available three times the 72,000 GSHs used (ie 216,000) for military use, from the 3.2m planned as GSHs, this amounts to 1.35% of the 16m GHs total and 6.75% of the 3.2m GSHs. RDL's target cost is $120k/GSH, ie $2.592b/year over 10 years
- The
target-cost/AIII, for production (and maintenance over 10 years) is
$8.620m. Presumably, their use, both in war and peace, would both be
covered, for 600 AIIIs, ie $5.232b. This totals $7.824b, covering both GSH and AIII, ie $782.4m/year
- The use of AIII, GSHs and GSSHs in war could offset up-to-the-$782.4m/year from their civil earnings of $9b/year, ie 8.695%
- After the first ten years, roughly 2010 through
2020, it is expected that the range of GCHs could be extended to 10,000
miles, or longer, effectively eliminating the need for AIIIs used to produce
hydrogen and refueling GSHs, at sea, for use in war or peace
- RDL
will study the advantages of encouraging "trans-global" migration by
using AIII, GH and GSH, especially instead of airplanes and aircraft
carriers, fossil fuel and nuclear power
- Another area of RDL investigation is related to weapons and methodology (carried by troops for self defense) and avoiding need for mass destruction of homes, businesses, industrial plants (to prevent enemies supplying weapons, troops or terrorists to enemy forces). This includes; but is not limited to detection and destruction of land mines, booby traps, etc without significant cost or danger to friendly troops.
Choice of Mobile Micro Airport [MMA] LocationIn September and early October of 2008, the newly elected, Conservative Mayor of London, John Johnson, was considering a proposal to build a new airport in the Thames Estuary. At this time, RDL recommended its alternative plan for an anchorage in the Thames Estuary for convoys of AIIIs, to serve as Mobile Micro Airports. This would obviously replace the need for airport expansion for Fossil Fueled [FF] aircraft, but handling landing, rerfueling and takeoff of hydrogen fueled, Zero-CO2, GHs, including the newly specified Gavin "SuperSea" Hawks [GSSH].
On the 10th of October, The Labor GovenmentTransport Secretary, Geoff Hoon, approved applications for expansions of the Stansted Airport, to handle 10m more airplane passengers, presumably annually, flying in and out of London. It is extremely doubtful if this plan can be justified or financially feasible in the next foru or five years, in view of the current international financial problems. The necessary funds would be best provided to build and maintain the first 25 of the planned 600 AIIIs, for five years ie $216m. Twenty five AIIIs could handle 3k Hawks with 10 passengers each, ie 30k passengers per day and 10.95m passengers/year. This is slightly less than than $20/passenger to provide the equivalent of an airport.
| |