STANFORD
UNIVERSITY
STANFORD, CALIFORNIA
GRADUATE
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Psychological
Testing Report
On
James Gavin
Embry
Organization:
Pacific Coast Engineering Company
Oak Street and Clement
Avenue
Alameda,
California
Age at
Test: 30 years
Mental
Ability (General): On a test designed to measure general ability
to reason, to learn, to think, to remember, etc., Mr. Embry’s performance was in
the highest one percent of a representative sample of college students in
four-year colleges and universities.
Within the test there was no significant difference in performance level
between the quantitative (numerical) and linguistic (verbal) factors. Nor was there any difference between the
reading effectiveness score and the other (quantitative, verbal, total)
scores. Within the reading effectiveness
score there was no difference in performance level between those parts having to
do with reading of quantitative materials and those having to do with the
reading of verbal materials. The overall performance places Mr. Embry in the
highest one-tenth of one per cent of the general adult population in this
country.
Mental
Ability (Abstract Reasoning): Mr Embry’s
performance on a test of high-level, abstract (“pure”) reasoning indicates that
as compared to a general group of students in graduate study at leading
universities he ranks in the upper three per cent of the group. As compared to a group of graduate students
in engineering (all fields, one-third Masters candidates and two-thirds PhD
candidates) he again scored in the top one per cent of the group. As compared to graduate students in Business
Administration (two-thirds Masters candidates, one-third PhD candidates) he
again scored in the top one per cent of the group. As compared to the general adult population
of this country, as usual he scores in the highest one tenth of one per
cent.
Mental
Ability (critical-Logical Reasoning):
Mental
Ability (Practical Judgement):
Supervisory
Knowledge:
In the
interest of the economy for both time and space, let it simply be said that in
the three measurement areas noted above, Mr Embry’s scores range from an upper
position of one tenth to one hundredth of one percent to a [low] of the upper
one per cent of any group of any group it is currently possible to compare him
with. If the reader has any questions
concerning these matters, it is suggested that he contact Mr. Embry, who will
undoubtedly be able to furnish eminently satisfactory
answers.
Vocational
Interests: The primary and overriding interest element
in Mr. Embry’s pattern of measured vocational interests takes the form of a very
general Administrative-Supervisory-Managerial interest which extends completely
across every major type of occupation represented on the interest measuring
instrument used. There are, it is true,
some slight but probably insignificant discriminations to be made in absolute
concentration of interest scores within functional interest areas, showing
Social Service (service to people) as his primary concentration, followed in
descending order by concentrations in Applied, Professional, Technical,
Semi-Technical (artisan-like, craftsman-like), Scientific—Technical,
Verbal-Linguistic (written word manipulation), Business detail, Business Contact
(business persuasion, sales, public relations, etc.) As can be seen from the extreme heterogeneity
of Mr. Embry’s measured vocational interests, it is highly likely that he will
have to (1) go into some sort of business for himself, in which he can exercise
adequately in all functional areas, or (2) he will have to somehow rise to
general management levels within a larger business or industrial organization,
in order that he may find adequate outlet for the generalized managerial
interest pattern that is so broadly supported by evident interest in every
measurable occupational activity
area. Fortunately, Mr. Embry’s
wide-ranging interest pattern, which would look most appropriate at high
managerial levels, it (sic) accompanied by an occupational aspiration level that
would appear to draw him upward to that same level.
Personality
Characteristics: Unless Mr.
Embry’s notable intellectual capacities have allowed him to neutralize a very
cantankerous personality test with almost complete success; it would appear that
he is about as normal and healthy person as it has been the writer’s good
fortune to encounter in the analysis of a good many hundreds of these
personality assessments. That is not to
say that Mr. Embry will not have faults; he undoubtedly has, however, it is
likely that such faults are rather directly the result of simple inadequacy of
experience or lack of opportunity to encounter the requisite information for
operation in a particular situation. The
personality test results reflect an almost optimum blend and balance of
independence-knowledgeable dependence, energy and activity-constraint and
caution, ambitions and drive-perspicacity and tolerance, realism-optimism,
cooperation-initiative, impulsiveness-thoughtfulness, mental
toughness-sensitivity, generosity-enlightened selfishness. In short, it is difficult to envision that
vocational goal which would be justifiably denied Mr. Embry either because of
inadequate intellectual capacities or inappropriate personal
characteristics.